Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Levine v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Levine v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

244 A.D.2d 280, 665 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11909
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Levine v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal. Read the opinion of the Court — 243 A.D.2d 373 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 25, 1997·Published

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered November 13, 1996, which denied petitioner tenant’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s determination that [281]*281petitioner’s landlord did not fail to provide an essential service, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s determination that the landlord provided petitioner with a functional TV master antenna is supported by substantial evidence, namely, the second inspection report. In the present circumstances, we perceive no basis for judicial interference with respondents’ reliance upon that second report. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Levine v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 244 A.D.2d 280, 665 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 280 (Levine v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.