Levine v. Levine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Levine v. Levine

102 A.D.2d 799, 477 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18959

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 102 A.D.2d 799 (Levine v. Levine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levine v. Levine, 102 A.D.2d 799, 477 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18959 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinions

Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered November 15,1983, held in abeyance, and the matter remanded to the trial court for the makings of findings of fact as required by CPLR 4213 and section 236 (part B, subd 5, pars d-g) of the Domestic Relations Law. I While examination of the record discloses support for the conclusions of law reached by the trial court in its judgment, we cannot tell the precise findings relied on to reach those conclusions. Accordingly, we remand for such findings (CPLR 4213). Similarly, there are no specific findings with respect to the 10 factors enumerated in section 236 (part B, subd 5, par d), consideration of which under paragraph g of subdivision 5 “may not be waived by either party or counsel”. Hence, upon such remand, these findings must also be made. Concur — Ross, Bloom, Lynch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered November 15,1983, held in abeyance, and the matter remanded to the trial court for the makings of findings of fact as required by CPLR 4213 and section 236 (part B, subd 5, pars d-g) of the Domestic Relations Law. I While examination of the record discloses support for the conclusions of law reached by the trial court in its judgment, we cannot tell the precise findings relied on to reach those conclusions. Accordingly, we remand for such findings (CPLR 4213). Similarly, there are no specific findings with respect to the 10 factors enumerated in section 236 (part B, subd 5, par d), consideration of which under paragraph g of subdivision 5 “may not be waived by either party or counsel”. Hence, upon such remand, these findings must also be made. Concur — Ross, Bloom, Lynch and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A.D.2d 799, 477 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levine-v-levine-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack