Levine v. Lacy

375 U.S. 932, 84 S. Ct. 330
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 2, 1963
DocketNo. 435
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 375 U.S. 932 (Levine v. Lacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levine v. Lacy, 375 U.S. 932, 84 S. Ct. 330 (1963).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black would grant certiorari to consider the two following questions presented by petitioner which challenge the validity under the Federal Constitution and laws of a $9,000 default judgment rendered against him by a Virginia state court in a tort case involving an automobile accident:

(1) Whether entry of the default judgment while petitioner's answer and cross-claim — which had been filed in the United States District Court as authorized by 81 (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure — were pending, amounted under the circumstances to a denial of due process of law.

(2) Whether Virginia denied petitioner the kind of notice due process requires in rendering the judgment by default against him without giving him any notice at all to enable him to contest the judgment or its amount, despite the fact that he then had pending and undisposed of an answer and cross-bill, which had been filed months before the judgment by default was entered against him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arthur Levine v. Emily Kathryn Lacy
344 F.2d 695 (Fourth Circuit, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
375 U.S. 932, 84 S. Ct. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levine-v-lacy-scotus-1963.