Levine v. Janosek

308 F. App'x 527
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 30, 2009
DocketNo. 07-2987-cv
StatusPublished

This text of 308 F. App'x 527 (Levine v. Janosek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levine v. Janosek, 308 F. App'x 527 (2d Cir. 2009).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Samuel M. Levine, proceeding pro se, appeals from an April 13, 2007 grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant John Janosek.

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1) requires that a notice of appeal be [528]*528filed within thirty days of the entry of the judgment or order being appealed. Levine’s thirty-day filing period expired on May 14. Levine’s notice of appeal, however, was not filed until May 16, 2007, outside of the thirty day window. In Bowles v. Russell, the Supreme Court made “clear that the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” 551 U.S. 205, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 2366, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007). Accordingly, we DISMISS Levine’s appeal, as its untimely filing deprives us of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowles v. Russell
551 U.S. 205 (Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
308 F. App'x 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levine-v-janosek-ca2-2009.