Levine v. Howard
246 A.D.2d 315, 666 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered May 6, 1997, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Defendants’ motion was properly denied, there being, at a minimum, an issue of fact as to whether plaintiff, although not a signatory to the contract, was an intended beneficiary thereof (see, Lebensfeld v Bashkin, 144 AD2d 542). Concur—Milonas, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Levine v. Howard, 246 A.D.2d 315, 666 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).
246 A.D.2d 315 (Levine v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lebensfeld v. Bashkin
144 A.D.2d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)