Levine v. Hegeman Transfer & Lighterage Terminal, Inc.
This text of 123 A. 19 (Levine v. Hegeman Transfer & Lighterage Terminal, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was tried with the companion case of Samuel Kaufman against the same defendants. The matters discussed in that case are equally applicable here, with a single exception. The prohibition of recovery for failure to have a motor-vehicle registered is limited to the owner of the vehicle by the provisions of Chapter 400, § 61, of the Public *123 Acts of 1921. Prior to the Act of 1917, the same prohibition applied equally to the operator of the motor-vehicle and the passenger in the motor-vehicle. The present statute does not bar the plaintiff passenger from recovery for the failure of Kaufman, the owner of the motor-vehicle, to have had it registered. Shea v. Corbett, 97 Conn. 141, 147, 115 Atl. 694.
There is no error.
In this opinion the other judges concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 A. 19, 100 Conn. 122, 1923 Conn. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levine-v-hegeman-transfer-lighterage-terminal-inc-conn-1923.