Levine v. Fishman

134 Misc. 350, 235 N.Y.S. 549, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 884
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 27, 1929·Published

Opinions

Pee Cueiam.

By plaintiff’s own story the indorsed notes were accepted by him conditionally. On demand he refused to give them up. He had no power to hold them for any other purpose than to consult his lawyer as to whether he would retain them. The retention as matter of law constitutes an acceptance of them as payment.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Bijue and Petebs, JJ., concur; Callahan, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Levine v. Fishman, 134 Misc. 350, 235 N.Y.S. 549, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

134 Misc. 350 (Levine v. Fishman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dibble v. . Richardson
63 N.E. 829 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)