Levine v. Blumenthal
This text of 189 A. 54 (Levine v. Blumenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts, and the arguments thereon, adequately appear in the opinion of the Supreme Court, ubi supra. We find ourselves unable to perceive the distinction in principle or in essential facts, between this case and the recent decision of this court in Haynes Auto Repair Co. v. Wheels, Inc., 115 N. J. L. 447, a unanimous decision of this court.
The judgment under review will be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
189 A. 54, 117 N.J.L. 426, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levine-v-blumenthal-nj-1937.