Levine v. American International Group
This text of 16 A.D.3d 250 (Levine v. American International Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Edward Ramos, J.), entered January 26, 2004, dismissing the complaint as against all defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The oral agreement by which defendants allegedly considered plaintiffs rights as vested under their deferred compensation plan in the event of his early termination was not capable of [251]*251performance within one year, and thus violated the statute of frauds (see Sheehy v Clifford Chance Rogers & Wells LLP, 3 NY3d 554 [2004]).
A cause of action for fraud arising out of a contractual relationship may be maintained only where the plaintiff alleges a breach of duty separate from, or in addition to, a breach of the contract (see Non-Linear Trading Co. v Braddis Assoc., 243 AD2d 107, 118 [1998]). In the absence of such pleading, the causes of action alleging fraud and fraudulent inducement were properly dismissed. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Ellerin and Nardelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 A.D.3d 250, 792 N.Y.S.2d 35, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levine-v-american-international-group-nyappdiv-2005.