Levine Deikman Co. v. United States
52 Cust. Ct. 284, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3728
United States Customs Court·Decided March 11, 1964·No. No. 68346; protests 198846-K, etc. (NewYork)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lace, not wholly or in chief value of cotton, rayon, or [285]*285silk, and that said lace is wholly or in chief value of a synthetic fiber (nylon), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), followed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Levine Deikman Co. v. United States, 52 Cust. Ct. 284, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3728 (cusc 1964).
52 Cust. Ct. 284 (Levine Deikman Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.