Levine Deikman Co. v. United States
52 Cust. Ct. 284, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3728
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 11, 1964
DocketNo. 68346; protests 198846-K, etc. (NewYork)
StatusPublished
This text of 52 Cust. Ct. 284 (Levine Deikman Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Levine Deikman Co. v. United States, 52 Cust. Ct. 284, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3728 (cusc 1964).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lace, not wholly or in chief value of cotton, rayon, or [285]*285silk, and that said lace is wholly or in chief value of a synthetic fiber (nylon), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), followed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
52 Cust. Ct. 284, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levine-deikman-co-v-united-states-cusc-1964.