Levinberg v. Moses

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Levinberg v. Moses

41 A.D.3d 221, 836 N.Y.S.2d 410

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.3d 221 (Levinberg v. Moses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levinberg v. Moses, 41 A.D.3d 221, 836 N.Y.S.2d 410 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County [222]*222(Laura E. Drager, J.), entered September 8, 2006, awarding plaintiff temporary maintenance of $69,000 a month, consisting of $39,000 for certain designated expenses (mostly carrying costs of homes, health insurance, club memberships and religious organizations, child care and housekeeping, car and driver, and tuition, room and board, tutoring and extracurricular activities for the children), and $30,000 for undesignated expenses, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The award appears to reasonably balance the parties’ marital standard of living with plaintiff’s reasonable needs and defendant’s ability to pay, and to be otherwise properly based on Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6) (a). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Buckley, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County [222]*222(Laura E. Drager, J.), entered September 8, 2006, awarding plaintiff temporary maintenance of $69,000 a month, consisting of $39,000 for certain designated expenses (mostly carrying costs of homes, health insurance, club memberships and religious organizations, child care and housekeeping, car and driver, and tuition, room and board, tutoring and extracurricular activities for the children), and $30,000 for undesignated expenses, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The award appears to reasonably balance the parties’ marital standard of living with plaintiff’s reasonable needs and defendant’s ability to pay, and to be otherwise properly based on Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6) (a). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Buckley, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.3d 221, 836 N.Y.S.2d 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levinberg-v-moses-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack