Levin v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Levin v. Ward

13 A.D.2d 536, 213 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12017

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 536 (Levin v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levin v. Ward, 13 A.D.2d 536, 213 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12017 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover brokerage commissions claimed to be due plaintiff in connection with the sale of a nursing home, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 12, I960, upon the decision of the Justice at Special Term, after a nonjury trial, dismissing the complaint on the merits. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the finding that the notice mailed by plaintiff to defendants Ward and Orth advising them the Roddens were prospective purchasers, was never received by the addressee. The evidence is also sufficient to sustain the finding that there was no proof of fraud, conspiracy, or inducement of breach of contract. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover brokerage commissions claimed to be due plaintiff in connection with the sale of a nursing home, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 12, I960, upon the decision of the Justice at Special Term, after a nonjury trial, dismissing the complaint on the merits. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the finding that the notice mailed by plaintiff to defendants Ward and Orth advising them the Roddens were prospective purchasers, was never received by the addressee. The evidence is also sufficient to sustain the finding that there was no proof of fraud, conspiracy, or inducement of breach of contract. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 536, 213 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levin-v-ward-nyappdiv-1961.