Levin v. Township of Warren

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Levin v. Township of Warren

204 A.2d 28, 85 N.J. Super. 118, 1964 N.J. Super. LEXIS 277

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedOctober 16, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.2d 28 (Levin v. Township of Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levin v. Township of Warren, 204 A.2d 28, 85 N.J. Super. 118, 1964 N.J. Super. LEXIS 277 (N.J. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

[120]*120The opinion of the court was delivered by

Sullivan, J. A. D.

Defendant-appellant, Warrenbrook Realty Co., was the successful bidder at a public sale of surplus lands owned by defendant the Township of Warren. Said lands were located in the Township of Green Brook. Plaintife-respondents, taxpayers of the Township of Warren, filed an action in lieu of prerogative writs challenging the legality of the aforesaid sale. The trial court held that the sale proceedings were void because public advertisement of said sale had not been made in the Warren Township Sentinel, the newspaper designated by the Township of Warren under R. S. 40 :53—1 as the official newspaper for the publication of all advertisements and notices required by law to be published.

Defendant-appellant argues that the sale proceedings were had under N. J. S. A. 40 :60-26(a) which requires that notice of sale be published in a newspaper circulating in the municipality in which the lands are situated. It is undisputed that the sale was so advertised (in the Plainfield Courier News), and the argument is made that the specific provisions of this statute as to advertising, supersede the general provisions of R. S. 40 :53-l.

We conclude, as did the trial court, that the advertisement provisions of N. J. S. A. 40:60-26 (a) did not relieve defendant municipality of the requirement of advertising the sale in its official, designated newspaper. The requirement of public advertising is not only to stimulate bidding for the land but is also intended to inform the local citizenry of the proposed official action.

Judgment herein is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by Judge Gerofsky in his oral opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[120]*120The opinion of the court was delivered by

Sullivan, J. A. D.

Defendant-appellant, Warrenbrook Realty Co., was the successful bidder at a public sale of surplus lands owned by defendant the Township of Warren. Said lands were located in the Township of Green Brook. Plaintife-respondents, taxpayers of the Township of Warren, filed an action in lieu of prerogative writs challenging the legality of the aforesaid sale. The trial court held that the sale proceedings were void because public advertisement of said sale had not been made in the Warren Township Sentinel, the newspaper designated by the Township of Warren under R. S. 40 :53—1 as the official newspaper for the publication of all advertisements and notices required by law to be published.

Defendant-appellant argues that the sale proceedings were had under N. J. S. A. 40 :60-26(a) which requires that notice of sale be published in a newspaper circulating in the municipality in which the lands are situated. It is undisputed that the sale was so advertised (in the Plainfield Courier News), and the argument is made that the specific provisions of this statute as to advertising, supersede the general provisions of R. S. 40 :53-l.

We conclude, as did the trial court, that the advertisement provisions of N. J. S. A. 40:60-26 (a) did not relieve defendant municipality of the requirement of advertising the sale in its official, designated newspaper. The requirement of public advertising is not only to stimulate bidding for the land but is also intended to inform the local citizenry of the proposed official action.

Judgment herein is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by Judge Gerofsky in his oral opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.2d 28, 85 N.J. Super. 118, 1964 N.J. Super. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levin-v-township-of-warren-njsuperctappdiv-1964.