Levin v. Shanbron

246 A.D. 783
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion for leave to amend his answer so as to set up the New Jersey Statute of Limitations, reversed upon the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, and defendant may serve his amended answer within five days from the entry of the order hereon. While defendant delayed more than three years in making the motion, it affirmatively appears that plaintiffs were not prejudiced by the delay. The only claimed prejudice is that if defendant had pleaded the statute in his original answer, plaintiffs could have discontinued this action and commenced a new action in Pennsylvania, where they resided. This contention is untenable because the Pennsylvania statute, like the New Jersey statute, provides for a two-year limitation as to personal injury actions. Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Levin v. Shanbron, 246 A.D. 783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

246 A.D. 783 (Levin v. Shanbron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Everson v. Toia
89 Misc. 2d 999 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)