Levin v. Shanbron

246 A.D. 783
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 246 A.D. 783 (Levin v. Shanbron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levin v. Shanbron, 246 A.D. 783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion for leave to amend his answer so as to set up the New Jersey Statute of Limitations, reversed upon the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, and defendant may serve his amended answer within five days from the entry of the order hereon. While defendant delayed more than three years in making the motion, it affirmatively appears that plaintiffs were not prejudiced by the delay. The only claimed prejudice is that if defendant had pleaded the statute in his original answer, plaintiffs could have discontinued this action and commenced a new action in Pennsylvania, where they resided. This contention is untenable because the Pennsylvania statute, like the New Jersey statute, provides for a two-year limitation as to personal injury actions. Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Everson v. Toia
89 Misc. 2d 999 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levin-v-shanbron-nyappdiv-1935.