Levin v. Noble

269 A.D. 808, 55 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3945
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 9, 1945·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order modified on the law by striking therefrom the second ordering paragraph and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We do not regard defendant’s offer to his creditors of a composition based upon a 12%% cash payment of the indebtedness as sufficient to toll the statute as provided in section 59 of the Civil Practice Act. (Connecticut Trust & S. D. Co. v. Wead, 172 N. Y. 497; Downey v. Palmer, 114 F. 2d 116; Williston on Contracts [Rev. ed.], § 181; 1 Wood on Limitations, § 78, p. 418.) We think that plaintiff under proper pleading may be entitled to recover the amount of the compromise. All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and grants defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in an action to recover the amount alleged to be due on two promissory notes.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Levin v. Noble, 269 A.D. 808, 55 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

269 A.D. 808 (Levin v. Noble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Glens Falls Insurance
546 F. Supp. 643 (N.D. New York, 1982)
Shaad v. Hutchinson's Boat Works, Inc.
84 Misc. 2d 631 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)
Rookery Investing Co. v. Audley Construction Corp.
188 Misc. 693 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)