Levin v. Hendelman

107 N.Y.S. 618
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 12, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 N.Y.S. 618 (Levin v. Hendelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levin v. Hendelman, 107 N.Y.S. 618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By evidence which the court below deemed worthy of credence, the plaintiff showed that he would have been entitled to recover the sum of $24 for work done for the defendants in making a lot of six garments, and upon another lot of seven garments the sum of $24.50, making in all the sum of $48.50, had he fully completed the work given him to do. It is uncontradicted, however, that these garments cost the defendants on the first lot $4.50, and on the second lot $3.85, in all $8.35, to complete the work which the plaintiff should [619]*619have done. As to a third lot claimed to have been done by the plaintiff, it appears by his own testimony that he simply took the lot from one shop to another, but was not allowed to do any work upon the same. The judgment rendered was for $55.50 in favor of plaintiff. As the testimony appears, the defendant was entitled to recover but $40.15.

Judgment modified, by reducing the same to $40.15, with appropriate costs and $5 extra costs in the court below, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Porus v. Hendelman
107 N.Y.S. 619 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 N.Y.S. 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levin-v-hendelman-nyappterm-1907.