Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Levin v. Eleto Realty Corp.

Levin v. Eleto Realty Corp.

160 Misc. 141, 289 N.Y.S. 667, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1691
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 6, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 160 Misc. 141 (Levin v. Eleto Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levin v. Eleto Realty Corp., 160 Misc. 141, 289 N.Y.S. 667, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The facts presented do not justify a holding that the failure of the landlord to supply a new lock or to supply other mouldings on the door was the proximate cause for the loss which occurred. The evidence does not establish that the loss in the manner testified to could have been reasonably anticipated so as to impose further duty to repair the condition complained of.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Hammer and FrankenthaJJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. ABC Realty Co.
71 Misc. 2d 384 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Tirado v. Lubarsky
49 Misc. 2d 543 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1966)
McCappin v. Park Capitol Corp.
126 A.2d 51 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 Misc. 141, 289 N.Y.S. 667, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levin-v-eleto-realty-corp-nyappterm-1936.