Levin v. Brooks
This text of 159 So. 2d 914 (Levin v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a summary final judgment in favor of the defendant based upon the trial judge’s holding that the plaintiff failed to commence this action within one year from the date of this court’s reversal of a prior judgment for the plaintiff.
Section 95.06 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., provides:
“If an action shall be commenced within the time prescribed therefor, and a judgment therein for the plaintiff be reversed on appeal or writ of error, the plaintiff, or, if he die and the cause of action survives, his heirs or representatives, may commence a new action within one year after the reversal." [Emphasis supplied.]
The trial judge held that the one year period began to run from the date of the filing of our decision of reversal with the [915]*915clerk of this court. We hold that the trial court was in error in that the one year period began to run from the date of the issuance by this court of its mandate.
Reversed and remanded with directions to reinstate the cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 So. 2d 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levin-v-brooks-fladistctapp-1964.