Levi v. Ray
This text of Levi v. Ray (Levi v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6878
BERNARD S. LEVI,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
M. E. RAY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-00-2318-2-24)
Submitted: June 26, 2002 Decided: July 12, 2002
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard S. Levi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Bernard S. Levi appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying
reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s order accepting with modification the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Levi v. Ray, No. CA-00-2318-2-24 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 25,
2001; entered Apr. 27, 2002 & filed Jan. 22, 2002; entered Jan. 24,
2002). We deny Levi’s motion for a temporary restraining order and
a preliminary injunction, and his motion for correction of the
district court’s docket entry. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Levi v. Ray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levi-v-ray-ca4-2002.