Levi v. Makalei

Hawaii Supreme Court

Levi v. Makalei

19 Haw. 565, 1909 Haw. LEXIS 87

CourtHawaii Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 12, 1909

DocketNo. 7

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Haw. 565 (Levi v. Makalei) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levi v. Makalei, 19 Haw. 565, 1909 Haw. LEXIS 87 (haw 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

The defendant excepted to the denial of his motions for a nonsuit and new trial, based upon his claim that the land was not identified. There was ample evidence by witnesses who were familiar with the land and. its location and of the possession and cultivation by the -plaintiff and his father for over twenty years, and of the present possession and ouster by the defendant. “One with knowledge, even though not a surveyor, may testify to such facts.” O. R. & L. Co. v. Armstrong, 18 Haw. 260.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

The defendant excepted to the denial of his motions for a nonsuit and new trial, based upon his claim that the land was not identified. There was ample evidence by witnesses who were familiar with the land and. its location and of the possession and cultivation by the -plaintiff and his father for over twenty years, and of the present possession and ouster by the defendant. “One with knowledge, even though not a surveyor, may testify to such facts.” O. R. & L. Co. v. Armstrong, 18 Haw. 260.

Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Haw. 565, 1909 Haw. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levi-v-makalei-haw-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack