Levi v. Harlem

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Levi v. Harlem

32 Misc. 735, 66 N.Y.S. 1136

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 735 (Levi v. Harlem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levi v. Harlem, 32 Misc. 735, 66 N.Y.S. 1136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only conclusion which the evidence warrants as to compensation is that the plaintiffs were to receive fifty dollars.

The witness Silverman alone testified as to the amount of the commissions, and he said that the plaintiffs were to get fifty dollars.

There was no evidence which conflicts with his statement.

As to jurisdiction, see Worthington v. London Guarantee & Accident Co., 164 N. Y. 81.

[736]*736The judgment is, therefore, modified by reducing it $100, and as modified is affirmed, without costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment modified, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI