Levi v. Aerotek, Inc.

204 S.W.3d 667, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1370, 2006 WL 2669368
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 19, 2006·No. No. WD 66743·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hunter Levi appeals from an order issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his application for unemployment benefits pursuant to § 288.050 based upon a finding that he left his employment with Aerotek, Inc. voluntarily and without good cause attributable to his work or his employer. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude [668] that the Commission s order is supported by sufficient competent evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Levi v. Aerotek, Inc., 204 S.W.3d 667, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1370, 2006 WL 2669368 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

204 S.W.3d 667 (Levi v. Aerotek, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.