Levi Leviness v. State
This text of Levi Leviness v. State (Levi Leviness v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-17-00437-CR ____________________
LEVI LEVINESS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 163rd District Court Orange County, Texas Trial Cause No. B160503-R ________________________________________________________ _____________
ORDER
Counsel of record for Levi Leviness filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for
the appellant. Although he signed the notice of appeal as counsel of record for the
appellant, counsel informs the Court that he has not been retained as counsel for the
appeal. No payment arrangements have been made for the clerk’s record and no
information regarding the appellant’s ability to pay the costs of an appeal has been
provided to this Court.
1 It is, therefore, ORDERED that the appeal is abated and the case is remanded
to the trial court for the purpose of determining whether counsel should be allowed
to withdraw as counsel on appeal. The trial court shall determine whether appellant
has retained new counsel for the appeal. If the trial court determines that counsel of
record should be allowed to withdraw, and that appellant has not retained new
counsel for the appeal, the trial court shall determine whether the appellant is
indigent for purposes of obtaining a free record on appeal and shall determine
whether counsel should be appointed, in which case the trial court may appoint new
counsel for the appeal unless the trial court admonishes appellant as to the dangers
of self-representation on appeal and determines that appellant’s decision to
relinquish the benefits associated with counsel and to proceed pro se is knowingly
and intelligently made. All appellate timetables are suspended pending resolution of
this matter in the trial court. A supplemental clerk’s record containing any orders
and findings made by the trial court pursuant to this Order, together with a reporter’s
record of any hearings conducted by the trial court, shall be filed with the Court of
Appeals by March 9, 2018.
ORDER ENTERED February 7, 2018.
PER CURIAM
Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Levi Leviness v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levi-leviness-v-state-texapp-2018.