Levi and Michelle McKenzie v. Community National Bank
Opinion
jf ourtlj Court of Sntouio,
March 30,2015
No.04-14-00540-CV
Levi and Michelle McKenzie, Appellants
v.
Community National Bank. Appellee
Trial Court Case No. 13-05-21 843-CV
O R D E R
The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in ibis appeal and has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument arc denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on May 12. 2015. to the following panel: Justice Marialyn Barnard. Justice Patricia 0. Alvarez, and Justice Jason Pulliam. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX, R. App. P. 48.
Either party may file- a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. Al'P. P, 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the dale of this order.
It is so ORDERED on March 30, 2015.
Marialwn Barnardc/Justiee
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this March 30. 201 5.
tile. Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Levi and Michelle McKenzie v. Community National Bank (Levi and Michelle McKenzie v. Community National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.