Levey v. Hemme

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Levey v. Hemme

7 A.D.2d 646, 180 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4222

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 A.D.2d 646 (Levey v. Hemme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levey v. Hemme, 7 A.D.2d 646, 180 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4222 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order granting discovery and inspection of a statement [647]*647concerning the accident, given by said infant to an investigator of appellants’ insurance carrier. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In view of the liberalized pretrial practice, the facts and circumstances herein, in our opinion, warranted the relief granted. (Wilhelm v. Abel, 1 A D 2d 55; Totoritus v. Stefan, 6 A D 2d 123; Molieran v. Kenna, 6 A D 2d 740; Destín v. Bernhard Mayer Estate, 123 N. Y. S. 2d 271; Merlihy v. Costa, 5 Misc 2d 192; Swartzman v. Sova, 11 Misc 2d 691.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order granting discovery and inspection of a statement [647]*647concerning the accident, given by said infant to an investigator of appellants’ insurance carrier. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In view of the liberalized pretrial practice, the facts and circumstances herein, in our opinion, warranted the relief granted. (Wilhelm v. Abel, 1 A D 2d 55; Totoritus v. Stefan, 6 A D 2d 123; Molieran v. Kenna, 6 A D 2d 740; Destín v. Bernhard Mayer Estate, 123 N. Y. S. 2d 271; Merlihy v. Costa, 5 Misc 2d 192; Swartzman v. Sova, 11 Misc 2d 691.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 646, 180 N.Y.S.2d 228, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levey-v-hemme-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack