Leveritt v. McCurdy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Leveritt v. McCurdy

157 S.E. 293, 172 Ga. 107, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 33

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 11, 1931

DocketNo. 7695

StatusPublished

This text of 157 S.E. 293 (Leveritt v. McCurdy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leveritt v. McCurdy, 157 S.E. 293, 172 Ga. 107, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 33 (Ga. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

On the facts of this ease the judge did not err in refusing to rescind his former order, and to require the receiver to pay into court the amount he had paid out under said order, and to grant authority to sue the receiver and his bondsman for such amount.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Bech, P. J., absent for providential cause. F. L. Breen and G. G. Finch, for plaintiff. D. C. Plaster and B. II. Burgess, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

On the facts of this ease the judge did not err in refusing to rescind his former order, and to require the receiver to pay into court the amount he had paid out under said order, and to grant authority to sue the receiver and his bondsman for such amount.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Bech, P. J., absent for providential cause. F. L. Breen and G. G. Finch, for plaintiff. D. C. Plaster and B. II. Burgess, for defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 S.E. 293, 172 Ga. 107, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leveritt-v-mccurdy-ga-1931.