Leveritt v. McCurdy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Leveritt v. McCurdy

157 S.E. 293, 172 Ga. 107, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 33

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 11, 1931·No. No. 7695·Published

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

On the facts of this ease the judge did not err in refusing to rescind his former order, and to require the receiver to pay into court the amount he had paid out under said order, and to grant authority to sue the receiver and his bondsman for such amount.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Bech, P. J., absent for providential cause. F. L. Breen and G. G. Finch, for plaintiff. D. C. Plaster and B. II. Burgess, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

On the facts of this ease the judge did not err in refusing to rescind his former order, and to require the receiver to pay into court the amount he had paid out under said order, and to grant authority to sue the receiver and his bondsman for such amount.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Bech, P. J., absent for providential cause. F. L. Breen and G. G. Finch, for plaintiff. D. C. Plaster and B. II. Burgess, for defendants.

Leveritt v. McCurdy, 157 S.E. 293, 172 Ga. 107, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 33 (Ga. 1931).

Pincite

157 S.E. 293 (Leveritt v. McCurdy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.