Leverette v. Kilpatrick
This text of 115 S.E. 34 (Leverette v. Kilpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing by the affidavit of the attorney for the defendant in error, and also of a third person, that the plaintiff in error, since the filing of the bill of exceptions, paid and discharged the judgment which was rendered against him, and there being no denial or any showing to the contrary by the plaintiff in error, or his attorney, who acknowledged notice thereof, the questions presented by the bill of exceptions become moot and it is ordered that the writ of error be dismissed.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 S.E. 34, 29 Ga. App. 333, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leverette-v-kilpatrick-gactapp-1922.