Leverette v. Kilpatrick
115 S.E. 34, 29 Ga. App. 333, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 286
Opinion
It appearing by the affidavit of the attorney for the defendant in error, and also of a third person, that the plaintiff in error, since the filing of the bill of exceptions, paid and discharged the judgment which was rendered against him, and there being no denial or any showing to the contrary by the plaintiff in error, or his attorney, who acknowledged notice thereof, the questions presented by the bill of exceptions become moot and it is ordered that the writ of error be dismissed.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leverette v. Kilpatrick, 115 S.E. 34, 29 Ga. App. 333, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 286 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
115 S.E. 34 (Leverette v. Kilpatrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Imperial Body Works, Inc. v. National Claims Service, Inc.
279 S.E.2d 534 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency v. Hill
518 S.W.2d 754 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1974)
City of Gainesville v. Loggins
158 S.E.2d 287 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Ketchum v. Price
119 S.E. 442 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Kirksey v. Geer
119 S.E. 440 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)