Leverette v. Kilpatrick

115 S.E. 34, 29 Ga. App. 333, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 286
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 20, 1922
Docket13397
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 115 S.E. 34 (Leverette v. Kilpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leverette v. Kilpatrick, 115 S.E. 34, 29 Ga. App. 333, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 286 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Bell, J.

It appearing by the affidavit of the attorney for the defendant in error, and also of a third person, that the plaintiff in error, since the filing of the bill of exceptions, paid and discharged the judgment which was rendered against him, and there being no denial or any showing to the contrary by the plaintiff in error, or his attorney, who acknowledged notice thereof, the questions presented by the bill of exceptions become moot and it is ordered that the writ of error be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Imperial Body Works, Inc. v. National Claims Service, Inc.
279 S.E.2d 534 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency v. Hill
518 S.W.2d 754 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1974)
City of Gainesville v. Loggins
158 S.E.2d 287 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Ketchum v. Price
119 S.E. 442 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Kirksey v. Geer
119 S.E. 440 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 S.E. 34, 29 Ga. App. 333, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leverette-v-kilpatrick-gactapp-1922.