Leventhal v. Weber-Peuthert Co.

173 A.D. 886

Opinion

No opinion. Present—Clarke, P. J., Scott, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ.; Smith, J., dissented, holding that the statement by Vogel was not binding on Leventhal, and that Leventhal can recover one-half of the note in suit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leventhal v. Weber-Peuthert Co., 173 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

173 A.D. 886 (Leventhal v. Weber-Peuthert Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.