Leventhal v. Weber-Peuthert Co.
173 A.D. 886
Opinion
No opinion. Present—Clarke, P. J., Scott, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ.; Smith, J., dissented, holding that the statement by Vogel was not binding on Leventhal, and that Leventhal can recover one-half of the note in suit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leventhal v. Weber-Peuthert Co., 173 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
173 A.D. 886 (Leventhal v. Weber-Peuthert Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.