Leventhal v. Lefkowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Leventhal v. Lefkowitz

46 A.D.2d 803, 362 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3618

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.2d 803 (Leventhal v. Lefkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leventhal v. Lefkowitz, 46 A.D.2d 803, 362 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by former tenants of an apartment to recover damages from their former landlord for wrongful eviction from the apartment, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 8, 1974, in favor of plaintiffs upon a decision awarding them $8,754 after a nonjury trial. Judgment modified, on the facts, by reducing the principal award to $2,500 and reducing the total recovery accordingly. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur; Martuscello, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by former tenants of an apartment to recover damages from their former landlord for wrongful eviction from the apartment, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 8, 1974, in favor of plaintiffs upon a decision awarding them $8,754 after a nonjury trial. Judgment modified, on the facts, by reducing the principal award to $2,500 and reducing the total recovery accordingly. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur; Martuscello, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 803, 362 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leventhal-v-lefkowitz-nyappdiv-1974.