Leventhal v. Lefkowitz

New York Court of Appeals

Leventhal v. Lefkowitz

352 N.E.2d 132, 39 N.Y.2d 859, 386 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2807

DecidedJune 2, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 352 N.E.2d 132 (Leventhal v. Lefkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leventhal v. Lefkowitz, 352 N.E.2d 132, 39 N.Y.2d 859, 386 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2807 (N.Y. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum. On this appeal by the plaintiffs the only issue before us is whether the Appellate Division erred in reducing the award to $2,500. Since there was no legal predicate for this reduction, the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the judgment of the Supreme Court reinstated.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order reversed, without costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court, Kings County, reinstated in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum. On this appeal by the plaintiffs the only issue before us is whether the Appellate Division erred in reducing the award to $2,500. Since there was no legal predicate for this reduction, the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the judgment of the Supreme Court reinstated.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order reversed, without costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court, Kings County, reinstated in a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

352 N.E.2d 132, 39 N.Y.2d 859, 386 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leventhal-v-lefkowitz-ny-1976.