Levens v. Arp
This text of 97 S.E. 893 (Levens v. Arp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the Civil Code (1910), § 5385 (see Hindman v. Raper, 140 Ga. 775, 79 S. E. 945), the owner of leased premises cannot recover double rent from a tenant holding over, unless demand is made for the surrender of the leased premises and possession is not delivered by the tenant after such demand. Accordingly, it was error for the court to charge the jury that the plaintiff was entitled to recover double rent for a year prior to the demand and the refusal to deliver possession of the properly so rented. There is' no other error of law complained of which would require a new trial. The court erred in overruling' the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 S.E. 893, 23 Ga. App. 198, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levens-v-arp-gactapp-1919.