Level v. State
386 So. 2d 294, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17237
Opinion
On Level’s appeal from convictions for theft of an automobile and related offenses, the circumstantial evidence, including Level’s shared possession of the recently stolen automobile, may reasonably have been regarded by the jury as proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Level and his companion were the thieves. See Palmer v. State, 323 So.2d 612 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert. den., 336 So.2d 108 (Fla.1976). No other reversible error appears.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Level v. State, 386 So. 2d 294, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17237 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).
386 So. 2d 294 (Level v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palmer v. State
323 So. 2d 612 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)