Levczuk v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Levczuk v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.

178 N.E.2d 427, 10 N.Y.2d 830

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 19, 1961

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 178 N.E.2d 427 (Levczuk v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levczuk v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 178 N.E.2d 427, 10 N.Y.2d 830 (N.Y. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that questions of fact were raised as to the liability of each defendant.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Foster. Judge Fuld dissents and votes to affirm the judgment appealed from in its entirety and Judge Burke dissents and votes to affirm the judgment as to defendants Walter Monroe Cory and Walter Monroe Cory Associates.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that questions of fact were raised as to the liability of each defendant.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Foster. Judge Fuld dissents and votes to affirm the judgment appealed from in its entirety and Judge Burke dissents and votes to affirm the judgment as to defendants Walter Monroe Cory and Walter Monroe Cory Associates.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 N.E.2d 427, 10 N.Y.2d 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levczuk-v-babcock-wilcox-co-ny-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack