Levack v. State
468 So. 2d 261, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 488, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12550
Opinion
We affirm the revocation of defendant’s probation. See Watkins v. State, 368 So.2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). However, we reverse and remand for resentencing.
The sentence imposed exceeded the maximum sentencing guidelines range, and no reasons were given for departure from the guidelines. See Fla.R.Crim.Pro. 3.701(d)(10). Defendant’s failure to object on this ground in the trial court does not preclude our review. See Rhoden v. State, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla.1984).
Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Levack v. State, 468 So. 2d 261, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 488, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12550 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
468 So. 2d 261 (Levack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Rhoden
448 So. 2d 1013 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Watkins v. State
368 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)