Leunes v. Lukas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Leunes v. Lukas

90 A.D.2d 808, 455 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19034

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 90 A.D.2d 808 (Leunes v. Lukas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leunes v. Lukas, 90 A.D.2d 808, 455 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19034 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, fraud and professional negligence, defendant Lukas appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), dated October 22, 1981, which, inter alia, vacated a prior order dismissing the action as to him and determined that the complaint was timely served on him. Matter remitted to Special Term to hear and report on the question of when the complaint was initially served; appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Special Term shall file its report with all convenient speed. Under the circumstances of this case, it is essential that a hearing be conducted to determine when the complaint was first served on appellant. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, fraud and professional negligence, defendant Lukas appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), dated October 22, 1981, which, inter alia, vacated a prior order dismissing the action as to him and determined that the complaint was timely served on him. Matter remitted to Special Term to hear and report on the question of when the complaint was initially served; appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Special Term shall file its report with all convenient speed. Under the circumstances of this case, it is essential that a hearing be conducted to determine when the complaint was first served on appellant. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A.D.2d 808, 455 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leunes-v-lukas-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack