Let's All Keep the Environment Safe v. Jorling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Let's All Keep the Environment Safe v. Jorling

209 A.D.2d 414, 619 N.Y.S.2d 572

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 209 A.D.2d 414 (Let's All Keep the Environment Safe v. Jorling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Let's All Keep the Environment Safe v. Jorling, 209 A.D.2d 414, 619 N.Y.S.2d 572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding for attorney’s fees pursuant to CPLR article 86, the petitioners appeal from an order of the the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), entered December 17, 1992, which denied their motion for attorney’s fees and expenses. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, entered April 23, 1993, as, in effect, upon granting reargument, adhered to the original determination (CPLR 5517 [b]).

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered December 17, 1992, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered April 23, 1993, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered April 23, 1993, is affirmed insofar as reviewed, for reasons stated by Justice Scarpino at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents Thomas Jorling and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation are awarded one bill of costs. Sullivan, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding for attorney’s fees pursuant to CPLR article 86, the petitioners appeal from an order of the the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), entered December 17, 1992, which denied their motion for attorney’s fees and expenses. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, entered April 23, 1993, as, in effect, upon granting reargument, adhered to the original determination (CPLR 5517 [b]).

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered December 17, 1992, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered April 23, 1993, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered April 23, 1993, is affirmed insofar as reviewed, for reasons stated by Justice Scarpino at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents Thomas Jorling and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation are awarded one bill of costs. Sullivan, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D.2d 414, 619 N.Y.S.2d 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lets-all-keep-the-environment-safe-v-jorling-nyappdiv-1994.