Letourneau v. Calandra

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 29, 2013·No. Civil Action No. 2012-1644·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________________ ) ELIZABETH LeTOURNEAU, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1644 (RBW) ) ANTHONY CALANDRA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

By order dated February 28, 2013, the plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this

action should not be dismissed for failure to serve the defendants in a timely fashion under Rule

4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court set March 22, 2013 as the deadline for the

plaintiff’s response; to date, the plaintiff has filed neither a response nor a request for additional

time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action and plaintiff’s motion to appoint

counsel will be denied as moot. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

REGGIE B. WALTON United States District Judge DATE: March 29, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Letourneau v. Calandra, (D.D.C. 2013).

Letourneau v. Calandra (Letourneau v. Calandra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.