Letourneau v. Calandra
This text of Letourneau v. Calandra (Letourneau v. Calandra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_________________________________________ ) ELIZABETH LeTOURNEAU, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1644 (RBW) ) ANTHONY CALANDRA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By order dated February 28, 2013, the plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this
action should not be dismissed for failure to serve the defendants in a timely fashion under Rule
4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court set March 22, 2013 as the deadline for the
plaintiff’s response; to date, the plaintiff has filed neither a response nor a request for additional
time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action and plaintiff’s motion to appoint
counsel will be denied as moot. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
REGGIE B. WALTON United States District Judge DATE: March 29, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Letourneau v. Calandra, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/letourneau-v-calandra-dcd-2013.