Leto v. Fishman

Supreme Court of Florida

Leto v. Fishman

88 So. 128, 81 Fla. 357

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 19, 1921·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the Order aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of [358]*358its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the Order aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of [358]*358its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

All concur.

Leto v. Fishman, 88 So. 128, 81 Fla. 357 (Fla. 1921).

Pincite

88 So. 128 (Leto v. Fishman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.