Leticia Sanders v. Michael J. Astrue
This text of 455 F. App'x 705 (Leticia Sanders v. Michael J. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Leticia Sanders, on behalf of her minor daughter D.S.H., appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of supplemental security income benefits. Upon de novo review, see Moore ex rel. Moore v. Barnhart, 413 F.3d 718, 721 (8th Cir.2005), we agree with the district court’s reasons for rejecting the arguments Sanders raised below, and we decline to consider the new contentions she raises on appeal, see Flynn v. Chater, 107 F.3d 617, 620 (8th Cir.1997). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
455 F. App'x 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leticia-sanders-v-michael-j-astrue-ca8-2012.