Leticia Nohemi Aviles Lopez v. Murray C. Bay
This text of Leticia Nohemi Aviles Lopez v. Murray C. Bay (Leticia Nohemi Aviles Lopez v. Murray C. Bay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued July 25, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00058-CV ——————————— LETICIA AVILES LOPEZ, Appellant V. MURRAY C. BAY, Appellee
On Appeal from the 308th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2014-57308
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On January 18, 2024, appellant, Leticia Aviles Lopez, filed a notice of appeal
from the trial court’s December 22, 2023 final order in the suit to modify the parent-
child relationship between appellant and appellee, Murray C. Bay. On June 21,
2024, appellant filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal and [Expedite] Issue of Mandate.” In her motion, appellant “request[ed] this Court grant [her] motion and
dismiss this appeal.”
No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), (c). Appellant’s motion does not include a certificate of
conference stating that appellant conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer,
with appellee regarding the relief requested in the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P.
10.1(a)(5). However, more than ten days have passed, and no party has expressed
opposition to appellant’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2).
Appellant also requested that the Court expedite and immediately issue its
mandate. However, this Court may only issue a mandate earlier than the time
prescribed by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure “if the parties so agree, or for
good cause on the motion of a party.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1(c). Appellant’s
motion does not state that appellee has agreed to the request for immediate issuance
of the mandate, nor does her motion establish good cause for the immediate issuance
of the mandate.
We grant appellant’s motion to the extent it seeks dismissal of the appeal and
dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We deny appellant’s
request for immediate issuance of the mandate and dismiss all other pending motions
as moot.
2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leticia Nohemi Aviles Lopez v. Murray C. Bay, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leticia-nohemi-aviles-lopez-v-murray-c-bay-texapp-2024.