Lester v. Thompson & White

New York Supreme Court

Lester v. Thompson & White

1 Johns. 300

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1806

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Johns. 300 (Lester v. Thompson & White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lester v. Thompson & White, 1 Johns. 300 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

The discharge is conclusive as to the facts-stated in. it, except as to those particular acts or frauds expressed in the eleventh section of the statute. The fact now alleged is not one of those mentioned. The plaintiff should have contested this question before the judge, before the discharge was granted : he is nqw too late in his [301]*301objection, and is precluded by his own default, from con-r L v Í . A testing the validity of the discharge on that ground.

Judgment for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

The discharge is conclusive as to the facts-stated in. it, except as to those particular acts or frauds expressed in the eleventh section of the statute. The fact now alleged is not one of those mentioned. The plaintiff should have contested this question before the judge, before the discharge was granted : he is nqw too late in his [301]*301objection, and is precluded by his own default, from con-r L v Í . A testing the validity of the discharge on that ground.

Judgment for the defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Johns. 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lester-v-thompson-white-nysupct-1806.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack