Lester v. Thompson & White

1 Johns. 300
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1806·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

The discharge is conclusive as to the facts-stated in. it, except as to those particular acts or frauds expressed in the eleventh section of the statute. The fact now alleged is not one of those mentioned. The plaintiff should have contested this question before the judge, before the discharge was granted : he is nqw too late in his [301] objection, and is precluded by his own default, from con-r L v Í . A testing the validity of the discharge on that ground.

Judgment for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lester v. Thompson & White, 1 Johns. 300 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

1 Johns. 300 (Lester v. Thompson & White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ansonia Brass Co. v. Conner
62 How. Pr. 272 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1881)
Soule v. Chase
1 Abb. Pr. 48 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1863)
Reed v. Gordon
1 Cow. 50 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)