Lester v. State

20 So. 3d 1012, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16367, 2009 WL 3617947
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lester v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9621
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 4, 2009·No. 4D08-713·Published

Opinion

DAMOORGIAN, J.

The Appellant, Earl Western Lester, appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence for lewd or lascivious molestation and his designation as a sexual predator. We affirm his conviction and sentence without discussion. However, we reverse his designation as a sexual predator because he does not meet the criteria for such a designation. See, e.g., Ealum v. State, 943 So.2d 994, 995 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Hickey v. State, 915 So.2d 663, 663-64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); State v. Bouchil-lon, 882 So.2d 412, 412-13 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). On remand, the trial court shall vacate the order designating the Appellant a sexual predator.

Affirmed in part; Reversed in part and Remanded with instructions.

MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lester v. State, 20 So. 3d 1012, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16367, 2009 WL 3617947 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

20 So. 3d 1012 (Lester v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ealum v. State
943 So. 2d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
State v. Bouchillon
882 So. 2d 412 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Hickey v. State
915 So. 2d 663 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)