Lester v. State
Opinion
The Appellant, Earl Western Lester, appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence for lewd or lascivious molestation and his designation as a sexual predator. We affirm his conviction and sentence without discussion. However, we reverse his designation as a sexual predator because he does not meet the criteria for such a designation. See, e.g., Ealum v. State, 943 So.2d 994, 995 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Hickey v. State, 915 So.2d 663, 663-64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); State v. Bouchil-lon, 882 So.2d 412, 412-13 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). On remand, the trial court shall vacate the order designating the Appellant a sexual predator.
Affirmed in part; Reversed in part and Remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
20 So. 3d 1012 (Lester v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.