Lester v. Southern Security Co.

147 S.E. 529, 168 Ga. 307, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 126
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 14, 1929
DocketNo. 6914
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 147 S.E. 529 (Lester v. Southern Security Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lester v. Southern Security Co., 147 S.E. 529, 168 Ga. 307, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 126 (Ga. 1929).

Opinion

Hines, J.

1. A creditor having a debt secured by title to property, where his debtor is adjudged a voluntary bankrupt, can, if he does not prove his debt in the bankruptcy court, institute an action in trover for the recovery of such property, and is entitled to obtain a money judgment against his debtor for the value of the property sued for, as against the plea of discharge in bankruptcy. Citizens Bank v. Mullis, 161 Ga. 371 (131 S. E. 44).

2. Any defense to the bail-trover proceeding, such as lack of demand by the creditor upon the debtor for the property to which he holds title and for which he sues, should be set up by the debtor in the trover action before judgment; and after judgment he is precluded from asserting sueli defense against the judgment in the trover proceeding. Civil Code (1910), § 4336; Watkins v. Lawton, 69 Ga. 671.

3. The fact that the creditor called up his trover action without notice to the debtor does not render the judgment in the trover suit void, it not being alleged that the debtor was not served with a copy of the trover proceeding, and no other fact being alleged which rendered it improper for the creditor to call up the trover proceeding.

4. The trial judge did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition [308]*308of the debtor seeking to recover from the creditor money collected under the garnishment proceeding based upon the money judgment obtained in the trover, suit, and to enjoin the creditor from further proceeding to enforce his judgment.

No. 6914. March 14, 1929. Scott & Hornbuckle, for plaintiff. Ezra E. Phillips, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chastain v. Consolidated Credit Corp.
147 S.E.2d 807 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Stephens v. Southern Discount Co.
125 S.E.2d 235 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Rowell v. Rowell
105 S.E.2d 19 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
RICH'S, INCORPORATED v. Montague
97 S.E.2d 188 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Hobbs v. Franklin Jewelry Co.
14 S.E.2d 136 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Hammond v. King
187 S.E. 413 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Van Pelt v. Family Loan Society
177 S.E. 595 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 S.E. 529, 168 Ga. 307, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lester-v-southern-security-co-ga-1929.