Lester v. South Carolina Department of Correctional "Perry"

Fourth Circuit

Lester v. South Carolina Department of Correctional "Perry"

699 F. App'x 249

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 24, 2017·No. No. 17-6751·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steve Lester appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lester’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lester v. SCDOC Perry, No. 4:16-cv-03829-TMC, 2017 WL 2377530 (D.S.C. June 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steve Lester appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lester’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lester v. SCDOC Perry, No. 4:16-cv-03829-TMC, 2017 WL 2377530 (D.S.C. June 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Lester v. South Carolina Department of Correctional "Perry", 699 F. App'x 249 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

699 F. App'x 249 (Lester v. South Carolina Department of Correctional "Perry") — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related