Lester v. South Carolina Department of Correctional "Perry"
This text of 699 F. App'x 249 (Lester v. South Carolina Department of Correctional "Perry") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Steve Lester appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lester’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lester v. SCDOC Perry, No. 4:16-cv-03829-TMC, 2017 WL 2377530 (D.S.C. June 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
699 F. App'x 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lester-v-south-carolina-department-of-correctional-perry-ca4-2017.