Lester v. Rattigan

523 F. App'x 245
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2013·No. No. 13-6117·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Lester appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Lester v. Ratigan, No. 6:12-cv-03410-TMC, 2013 WL 145031 (D.S.C. filed Jan. 11, 2013 & entered Jan. 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lester v. Rattigan, 523 F. App'x 245 (4th Cir. 2013).

523 F. App'x 245 (Lester v. Rattigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related