Lester v. Lester

44 S.E. 824, 118 Ga. 123, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 471
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 30, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 44 S.E. 824 (Lester v. Lester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lester v. Lester, 44 S.E. 824, 118 Ga. 123, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 471 (Ga. 1903).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Both the pleadings and the evidence bring this case clearly within the jurisdiction of a court of equity. The questions of law raised in the record do not present any reason for reversing the judgment of the lower court; and that court did not abuse its discretion in granting the injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

By Jive Justices. The..answer set up that one of the defendants paid to the plaintiff $500 on the purchase-price of the interests of their sisters in the property, and the other defendant offered to pay to the plaintiff his pro rata share thereof, but the plaintiff refused to receive it, saying “ that would be all right,” or words to that effect; that the payments for taxes, improvements, and repairs were made from a mercantile business in which the plaintiff and one of the defendants were equal partners; that all payments for taxes and other expenditures made during the life of their mother should have been made by her, and if made by plaintiff for her, his claim therefor'was against her life-estate, and not against defendants, who deny any such knowledge, acquiescence, or understanding as alleged by him; that his claim, if any he has, is barred by limitation; that he has received the rents of the property since September 1, 1900, to the exclusion of the defendants; that there are unpaid taxes on the property for three years; and that a materialman has filed a lien thereon, etc.; that the plaintiff is indebted to defendants, and not they to him; and that he is insolvent. On these pleadings and on conflicting evidence the court granted an injunction against the defendants until the case could be heard on its merits and the rights of the parties determined by final decree. J. S. Porter, for plaintiffs in error.

Payments by tenant in common: 35 Am. St. R. 419 : Civil Code, § 2823; 21 Am. & Eng. Ene. L. 1170; Freeman on Cot. & Part. §506. Expenses during .life-estate chargeable to life-tenant: 81 Ga. 229;. 74 Ga. 278; 100 Ga. 446. Injunction not proper: Ga. Rep. 52/231; 30/370; 41/124; 74/762; 95/359; 54/215 ; 77/29; 69/126, 491; 71/289, 818; 111/725.

May son, Hill & McGill, contra.

Equitable relief: Civil Code, §§4833, 4783 — 5, 3147. Partition: Story’s Eq. Jur. §§ 647 et seq. Injunction: 57 Ga. 38; 79 Ga. 164. Tenant in common, payments by: 79 Ky. 148; 41 Ill. 158; 91 Pa. St. 438; 79 N. Y. 478; 98 Ill. 78; 42 Ia. 128; 86 Ill. 29: 53 Miss. 475; 54 Miss. 323.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prentice v. . Janssen
79 N.Y. 478 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
Austell v. Swann
74 Ga. 278 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1885)
Lowe v. Burke
3 S.E. 449 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1887)
McCook v. Harp
7 S.E. 174 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)
Gardner v. Diederichs
41 Ill. 158 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1866)
Wilton v. Tazwell
86 Ill. 29 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1877)
Baird v. Jackson
98 Ill. 78 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1881)
Weare v. Van Meter
42 Iowa 128 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1875)
Alexander v. Ellison
79 Ky. 148 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1880)
Davidson v. Wallace
53 Miss. 475 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1876)
Allen v. Poole
54 Miss. 323 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 S.E. 824, 118 Ga. 123, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lester-v-lester-ga-1903.