Lester v. In Employee LT Church

Fourth Circuit

Lester v. In Employee LT Church

540 F. App'x 187

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 27, 2013·No. No. 13-6770·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steve Lester appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lester v. L.T. Church, No. 4:11-cv-02994-TMC, 2013 WL 1826449 (D.S.C. Apr. 80, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steve Lester appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lester v. L.T. Church, No. 4:11-cv-02994-TMC, 2013 WL 1826449 (D.S.C. Apr. 80, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lester v. In Employee LT Church, 540 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

540 F. App'x 187 (Lester v. In Employee LT Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related