Lester v. Greenville County Courthouse

Fourth Circuit

Lester v. Greenville County Courthouse

384 F. App'x 241

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2010·No. No. 09-7791·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Lester appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lester v. Greenville County Courthouse, No. 4:09-cv-01824-HFF, 2009 WL 2855170 (D.S.C. [242]*242Sept. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Lester appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lester v. Greenville County Courthouse, No. 4:09-cv-01824-HFF, 2009 WL 2855170 (D.S.C. [242]*242Sept. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lester v. Greenville County Courthouse, 384 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

384 F. App'x 241 (Lester v. Greenville County Courthouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related