Lester v. GNL, Corp.
This text of Lester v. GNL, Corp. (Lester v. GNL, Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Julie Lester, Case No. 2:24-cv-OH54-CDS-NJK 5 Plaintiff Order for Clarification on Settlement Terms v. 7|| GNL LLC, 8 Defendant 9 10 In their fourth stipulation to extend time to file a motion for court approval of settlement, plaintiff Julie Lester and defendant GNL LLC represent that they are working diligently but need additional time to finalize the terms of the settlement agreement. ECF No. 31. 13]| Where no class has been certified and dismissal would not affect putative class members’ claims, Rule 23(e) does not mandate either court approval of the parties’ settlement or notice to 15]| putative class members. Gaefcke v. Flatiron W,, Inc., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5390, *3 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 16|| 2024) (citing Titus v. BlueChip Fin., 786 F. App’x. 694, 695 (9th Cir. 2019)). In such a case, the settlement of this putative class would be governed by Rule 41 and a joint stipulation of 18|| dismissal would be sufficient. 19 Because the court is unsure whether the parties intend to dismiss the putative class members’ claims with or without prejudice, they are instructed to file a status report so advising by August 11, 2025. The court will decide at that point whether to approve the request for an additional time. / ) 23 Dated: August 4, 2025 J /
5 CrigtingD. Sia U ited States District Judge 26 /
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lester v. GNL, Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lester-v-gnl-corp-nvd-2025.