Lester v. Citizens' Savings Bank

20 A. 231, 17 R.I. 88, 1890 R.I. LEXIS 51
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided July 5, 1890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a bill to set aside a mortgagee’s deed and to redeem the mortgage, on the ground that the sale, which was advertised to take place April 11, A. D. 1885, at twelve o’clock noon, was not made at that hour. Some of the testimony introduced supports the bill, but more of it, in our opinion, goes to show that the sale, though much delayed, took place, or was at least begun, before the appointed hour had expired. The mortgagee’s affidavit, which the statute makes prima facie evidence, *89 states that the sale was at the hour. Our conclusion is, that the sale occurred between half past twelve and one o’clock, and that it was valid ; since, for the purposes of the sale, the hour of twelve must be taken to last until the hour of one begins, if the attendance continues. McGovern v. Union Mutual Life Insurance Co., 109 Ill. 151. We think the testimony shows that the attendance did continue with but slight changes, the auctioneer, who was holding an auction near by, being momentarily expected. There is no satisfactory evidence that any person intending to bid left before the bidding began.

John E. Lester, Amasa M. Eaton & Herbert Almy, for complainant. James M. Ripley, Samuel Ames & Nathan H. Truman, for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lester v. Citizens' Savings Bank, 20 A. 231, 17 R.I. 88, 1890 R.I. LEXIS 51 (R.I. 1890).

20 A. 231 (Lester v. Citizens' Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilmarth v. Helton
1938 OK 118 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)